From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/39828
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Raymond Scholz <ray-2001@zonix.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Limiting, catching up and undo behaviour
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 22:20:53 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <lgd.87zo66chmy.fsf@mde1.zonix.de>
References: <lgd.87pu77u88z.fsf@mde1.zonix.de>
	<iluwv1efb7w.fsf@dhcp128.extundo.com>
	<lgd.87ofmqunj9.fsf@mde1.zonix.de>
Reply-To: Raymond Scholz <rscholz@zonix.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175476 30036 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:44:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:44:36 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 7090 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 21:27:51 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 21:27:51 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 15zPMs-00083u-00; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:27:18 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:26:58 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA22327
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 15:26:42 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 7030 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2001 21:26:50 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 7024 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 21:26:50 -0000
Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (213.165.64.20)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 21:26:50 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 1707 invoked by uid 0); 1 Nov 2001 21:26:21 -0000
Original-Received: from a94d9.pppool.de (HELO mde1) (213.6.148.217)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp010-rz3) with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 21:26:21 -0000
Original-Received: from rscholz by mde1 with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 15zPGf-0004Zw-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2001 22:20:53 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Now-Playing: Propellerheads / DECKSANDRUMSANDROCKANDROLL / On Her Majestys
 Secret Service (MP3)
X-Face: %.!RBc`e*wW)84O*\)VdkC}mU5c2Zh$y~ZRA3K594g/jp_&5bx\Oyes!/jK~4<<%KlaPn^\
 0<bYDHHvSRxI<
In-Reply-To: <lgd.87ofmqunj9.fsf@mde1.zonix.de> (Raymond Scholz's message of
 "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:47:06 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1
 (i286-debian-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39828
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:39828

Raymond Scholz <ray-2001@zonix.de> writes:

> With adaptive scoring turned _on_, only visible unread articles are
> being catched up.  Huh?

By (cluelessly) looking at the code it turns out to be a feature.  It
even makes sense, because catching up would alter the score of
invisible articles with adaptive scoring turned on, which contradicts
the DWIM principle Gnus is following up ;)

Cheers, Ray
-- 
Hfr fgebat rapelcgvba!