* 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' @ 2004-03-29 11:25 Xavier Maillard 2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Xavier Maillard @ 2004-03-29 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Yo, Still learning Gnus article treat function. Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break RFC2646 ? Regards, zeDek ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' 2004-03-29 11:25 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Xavier Maillard @ 2004-05-16 14:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2004-05-16 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes: > Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break > RFC2646 ? Which standard is that? :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' 2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2004-05-16 21:31 ` Steinar Bang 2004-05-16 23:19 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Steinar Bang @ 2004-05-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw) >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>: > Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes: >> Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break >> RFC2646 ? > Which standard is that? :-) Format=Fixed, Format=Flowed parameter on text/plain. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' 2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang @ 2004-05-16 23:19 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2004-05-16 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes: >>> Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break >>> RFC2646 ? > >> Which standard is that? :-) > > Format=Fixed, Format=Flowed parameter on text/plain. > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html Right. But isn't format=flowed handling done before the gnus-treat-* functions are run? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-16 23:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-03-29 11:25 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Xavier Maillard 2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen 2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang 2004-05-16 23:19 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).