From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54872
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: lorentey@elte.hu (=?iso-8859-2?q?L=F5rentey_K=E1roly?=)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group?
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:48:39 +0100
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <lorentey.g.ding.87d6bnw6hk.elte@eris.elte.hu>
References: <lorentey.g.ding.874qx0gzl8.elte@eris.elte.hu>
	<4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
	<lorentey.g.ding.87llqbw7un.elte@eris.elte.hu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069332542 11423 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 12:49:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:49:02 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3412@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 20 13:49:00 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M3412@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AMoF2-0004bt-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:49:00 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AMoEq-0000EC-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:48:48 -0600
Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AMoEi-0000E6-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:48:40 -0600
Original-Received: from eris.elte.hu (eris.elte.hu [157.181.150.146])
	by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5D3A0026
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:48:40 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by eris.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5B86E7F816; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:48:39 +0100 (CET)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <lorentey.g.ding.87llqbw7un.elte@eris.elte.hu> 
 =?iso-8859-2?q?=28L=F5rentey_K=E1roly's?= message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:19:12 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54872
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54872

L=F5rentey K=E1roly <lorentey@elte.hu> writes:
> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> I could make a ham-destination option to use 'respool instead of a
>> group name, but just recently there was discussion of a nnimap bug
>> with respooling.  What if the respooling returns nil, do we leave
>> the ham message in the spam group?
>
> Hm.  What if spam-split would simply be disabled during the ham-exit
> respool?

Sorry, my mind was wandering about respooling back to the spam group.
When does respooling return nil?  Does it mean that the respooling
failed to categorize the message in any group?  I guess in my case,
leaving ham in the spam group is OK if it can not be meaningfully
resplit.

--=20
L=F5rentey K=E1roly