From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54868 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lorentey@elte.hu (=?iso-8859-2?q?L=F5rentey_K=E1roly?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: spam.el: automatically resplitting ham in a spam group? Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:19:12 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1069330779 7582 80.91.224.253 (20 Nov 2003 12:19:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:19:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3408@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 20 13:19:37 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AMnma-000379-00 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:19:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMnmO-0008LC-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:19:24 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AMnmG-0008L6-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:19:16 -0600 Original-Received: from eris.elte.hu (eris.elte.hu [157.181.150.146]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3E03A0026 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:19:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by eris.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 100EC7F816; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:19:13 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nfzgkdqzx.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:48:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54868 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54868 Ted Zlatanov writes: > You can set a ham-destination of "INBOX" or wherever your incoming > mail comes from. That might help you (but make sure to tell spam.el > to mark ham unread before moving it to INBOX). My incoming mail comes from a Maildir, where it gets put by fetchmail. I am hesitant about leaving my mail on a network server, so at the moment I use IMAP only as a kind of fancy POP3. I can not specify my incoming Maildir as a ham-destination, because having the same Maildir serve as a mail source and a Gnus group is an official Bad Practice(tm). Of course, I could have a cron job moving messages from the ham.proven group to my incoming Maildir. That would work, but it would be somewhat of a kludge. > The problem with automatic resplitting is that it could send your > mail back to the spam folder. I don't like that possibility. You are right, I have not thought about that. Of course, in my setup it would just mean that the mail gets back to the spam.candidates group and I have to have a look at it again the next time I decide for a little cherry-picking of false positives. Sooner or later, BogoFilter sees the message as ham so many times that its spamicity level gets below the threshold. > I could make a ham-destination option to use 'respool instead of a > group name, but just recently there was discussion of a nnimap bug > with respooling. What if the respooling returns nil, do we leave > the ham message in the spam group? Hm. What if spam-split would simply be disabled during the ham-exit respool? --=20 L=F5rentey K=E1roly