From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16962
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Lautenbacher <jens@tellux.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Wide images displayed inline
Date: 12 Sep 1998 00:11:38 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <lsiuiumh9h.fsf@schoenberg.tellux.de>
References: <m3ww7b42qw.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <byd89310rn.fsf@bolzano.math.ethz.ch> <m3yarrngty.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <lsn2864jfh.fsf@schoenberg.tellux.de> <vafsohy2wqu.fsf@ramses.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.4)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155747 30891 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:15:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:15:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Jens Lautenbacher <jens@tellux.de>, ding@gnus.org
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA21675
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 18:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAF13500; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 16:45:12 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 11 Sep 1998 17:12:40 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA16328 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 17:12:30 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from schoenberg.tellux.de (schoenberg.tellux.de [195.63.106.49])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA21559
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 1998 18:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from jtl@localhost)
	by schoenberg.tellux.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA30830;
	Sat, 12 Sep 1998 00:11:38 +0200
Original-To: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@amaunet.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
X-Face: Z[@OB)("ZvE?ev~1b+b!0ZUB.$%rh.9qE>dVf>q}Q/V?%d`J3gd!LR\aAZ8<Hwi]xTA(:*c;i3,?K?+rCy*^b$)a,}E?eo},}x2]5LlJysyoUOK"o[>K)'\Ulb7y-7*.If^;rHl['oa)n_M7E6w+LDKMs"G8_`c)uOS1^}.1|8Ill]7X68X-paeUOpBhz<F`B0?~^2Et~GYfw~/0]H]nx4~C_E/_mp#^7Ixc:
In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of "11 Sep 1998 22:57:29 +0200"
Original-Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.33/XEmacs 21.0 - "Erzgeberg-pre1"
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16962
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:16962

Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@amaunet.cs.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> >>>>> On 11 Sep 1998, Jens Lautenbacher said:
> 
>   Jens> Tee Really Right Thing To Do IMHO is of course to call convert
>   Jens> (from Imagemagick) to present a scaled down version of the
>   Jens> image just as wide as the frame is.
> 
> Why should one scale down the image if the user doesn't want it and
> the editor has perfectly good horizontal and vertical scroll bars?
> One should fix the editor, IMHO.

Because it would be a very nice thing anyway. even if it has perfectly 
nice scollbars and such. which it hasn't. and will not for the
forseable future. let's face it, support for anything which needs to
take into account the real pixel width sucks. 

jtl