From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20081 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Marking as already read when using gcc-self? Date: 04 Jan 1999 18:42:17 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <8690fj75et.fsf@slowfox.cs.uni-dortmund.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158419 15690 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:00:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10936 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 18:45:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAB26684; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 17:45:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 04 Jan 1999 17:43:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA15230 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 17:42:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ljz.asfast.net (gnus@ljz.asfast.net [205.230.75.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA07226 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 18:42:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by ljz.asfast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA19882; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 18:42:17 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM Lloyd Zusman writes: > > > If I set the `gcc-self' group parameter for a given group to `t', is > > there any way to cause any messages that are archived into that group > > via this method to automatically be marked as `read' as soon as they > > appear in the group? > > This is in the todo list. See the node `Newest Features' in the Gnus > info file. Ah yes ... I found it. It only contained the string "Gcc" and not "gcc-self", so I didn't find it in my previous search. Well, I'll devote a little bit of my time to this task. Perhaps Gcc could cause a special header to be inserted into its saved messages, such as ... X-Gnus-Gcc-Action: Where might be `tick' or `mark read' or something similar. This could be specified via some sort of option, such as ... (defvar gnus-gcc-action "mark read" "*Action to be taken when the message is Gcc'ed. Could be `tick', `mark read', etc.") Then, when entering summary mode, some routine (which one? ... well, I'll dig around and find it if no one can make a suggestion) could then recognize this `X-Gnus-Gcc-Action' header and perform the specified action. Does this sound like a good approach? Before I start hacking, I'd appreciate any feedback and opinions from those of you who are familiar with this part of Gnus. Thanks in advance. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com