From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19326 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Weird behaviours of message-insert-mime-part. Date: 30 Nov 1998 00:00:31 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157696 11033 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:48:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA10241 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:01:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAB25661; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:00:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:00:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA29072 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 23:00:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ljz.asfast.net (gnus@ljz.asfast.net [205.230.75.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA10230 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by ljz.asfast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA25461; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00:33 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM writes: > I'm using `pgnus-0.56' under XEmacs 20.4. > > I have some questions about some weird behaviors of the > `message-insert-mime-part' function (`C-a'). > > [ ... ] OOPS ... I should have not used explicit `part' tag syntax that message, because pgnus tried to interpret it upon sending it out. In that message, anywhere you see a backtick at the end of a line followed by three dots and a forward single-quote on the next line immediate following, assume that what I was really writing is this: `<[X][thing] ...>' where [X] is the hash character (`#') and [thing] is the word `part'. Sorry 'bout that. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com