From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21129 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Setting Status header in nnml? Date: 10 Feb 1999 11:38:07 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159293 21396 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:14:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03540 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:39:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB17603; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:38:16 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:38:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA19574 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 10:38:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from home.ljz.net (gnus@[207.198.184.200]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA03502 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:38:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by home.ljz.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA26346; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:38:08 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM writes: > Lloyd Zusman writes: > > > I'm wondering about the feasibility of an idea: could Gnus set the > > `Status:' header to some sort of meaningful value(s) in the actual > > message files when using the nnml back end? This way, some external > > (i.e., non-Gnus) software could interrogate the new/read/unread/etc. > > status of email in the various nnml directories I'm using. > > > > This would also be nice within the other back ends, as well, such as > > nnfolder ... but perhaps this is already done in some of these ... ??? > > Well, that information already exists. For example, you could just > parse the ~/.newsrc.eld file. I was hoping I wouldn't have to do that ... :):) > Using Status headers in the way you describe might be possible, but > would be really expensive. For instance, if you did a catchup on a > group with many articles, Gnus would have to open each file and modify > it. This could take a really long time. Yeah ... I know. But perhaps this capbility could be an option for those of us who want to pay the price in processing time. The default behavior could be the same as what we have today. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com