From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31827
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Is the gnus XEmacs package still necessary?
Date: 17 Jul 2000 22:10:57 -0400
Organization: Linux Hippopotamus Preserve
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ltn1jgi3wu.fsf@asfast.com>
References: <lt8zv0i567.fsf@asfast.com> <87r98smbwj.fsf@inanna.danann.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168194 16276 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:43:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:43:14 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B29D051E
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:11:36 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAC21764;
	Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:11:27 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:10:36 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02272
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 21:10:25 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from ljz.net (ljz.net [216.182.19.128])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3BD051E
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:10:58 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: by ljz.net (Postfix, from userid 510)
	id C205C3ECB0; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 22:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!<nimJxd1qyQRquvu5XTnZ:_5VE-G&4*EAuW"7oJLIXj'DWrJ0z@,FlwvD2PA@qhQ2R#zgsc14Klk;OSE'*;+l8p?0^nK7*X#0zg5wd^!M^2pg,M4Qd^{1viG;fa{}b.s[?g(x$45c]]=@'ZQ&]sPXl!u:hxBAv>j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM<qjGM,/6C6\|{))YWm6}Q#?3om%n8
In-Reply-To: "Daniel Pittman"'s message of "18 Jul 2000 12:04:44 +1000"
Original-Lines: 28
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Canyonlands)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31827
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31827

"Daniel Pittman" <daniel@danann.net> writes:

> On 17 Jul 2000, Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Is it still true that I need to have the XEmacs gnus package
> > (currently it's called "gnus-1.45") installed in order for the CVS
> > gnus to work?  Or have more recent CVS releases removed the
> > dependencies to anything that might be part of the XEmacs gnus
> > package?
> 
> For what it's worth, the latest package for XEmacs is actually the
> (close to) latest release of Gnus. You wouldn't actually need to use the
> CVS version any longer... :)

Thanks ... that's good to know.

Still, however, I prefer the CVS version.  Can I uninstall gnus-1.45
and still have the CVS version compile?  [I'd normally use the empirical
method and just try it, but it takes so long with my slow internet
connection to re-install XEmacs packages, that I'm trying to get
at least a somewhat warm-and-fuzzy feeling about uninstalling
gnus-1.45 before I actually do so.]

-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com