From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19828 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Backend-specific nnmail-spool-file? Date: 12 Dec 1998 22:08:41 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158108 13632 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:55:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA21336 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 22:09:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA31866; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:09:18 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:09:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA18345 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 21:09:03 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ljz.asfast.net (gnus@ljz.asfast.net [205.230.75.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA21318 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 22:08:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by ljz.asfast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA09296; Sat, 12 Dec 1998 22:08:42 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM writes: > Lloyd Zusman writes: > > > my preferred way of doing this would be to have one spool file > > called `/var/spool/mail/oneuser', another called > > `/var/spool/mail/anotheruser', etc. ... i.e., no special suffixes. > > Note that I would run Gnus as user `root', which is easy for me to > > do from my personal Linux machine at home. > > Icky. > > You really ought to do things the right way, instead of treating your > machine as if it was running some POS single-user operating system. > > It is quite trivial to receive mail for multiple addresses at one > machine and have them all be read by the same user without doing > anything nearly as silly as what you suggest. Of course. I can think of several ways to do it. I have already done this via procmail, via mailagent, via my own homegrown IMAP and POP3 Perl scripts, and via my own homegrown IMAP Python script, in each case using Gnus as the mailreader. However, the question I originally posted has to do with whether it can be done solely within Gnus, without any outside help. If the answer is "no", then I will just make use of one of the other approaches I mentioned above. If the answer is "yes", then I'm trying to figure out the best way to make it happen. And if you have something useful to contribute to this discussion, then I would appreciate your input. If, however, all you want to do is editorialize as to how silly you perceive the question to be, then why bother cluttering up this thread in the mailing list with your comments at all? -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com