From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21849 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: The "nnmail-spool-file" variable stopped functioning ... Date: 08 Mar 1999 21:05:55 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159877 25047 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:24:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA12071 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:07:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAB19812; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:06:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 08 Mar 1999 20:06:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA24213 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:06:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from home.ljz.net (gnus@[207.198.184.200]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA12033 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:06:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by home.ljz.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA22677; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:05:56 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM writes: > On 8 Mar 1999, David S. Goldberg wrote: > > > Was one of your changes the addition of the suffix on the maildrops? > > If so (and probably even if not :-) upgrade to 0.80. There's a bug in > > 0.79 that messes up incoming mail drop files that have suffixes. > > Well, I didn't change the suffix at all, but I'm in the process of > downloading 0.80, anyway. I'm pretty sure that things were previously > working under 0.79 before my changes. Well ... version 0.80 fixed my problem, after all. This is quite mysterious, however, because version 0.79 was working fine for more than a week before I started having the problem I mentioned. But all's well that ends well ... and I'm not going to worry too much about this mystery. Thanks to all for your helpful suggestions. -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com