From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23837
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 0.91] (Was: Still having mail problems with version 0.88)
Date: 05 Jul 1999 02:08:56 -0400
Organization: Linux Hippopotamus Preserve
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <ltyagvd3wn.fsf@asfast.com>
References: <ltemjdfwer.fsf@asfast.com> <m34sjmrsx0.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> <ltd7y8fa4h.fsf_-_@asfast.com> <87g134jejy.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <ltwvwgdolm.fsf@asfast.com> <m3iu7z8zu1.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161498 4179 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:51:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:51:38 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA05253
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 02:11:03 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAB01346;
	Mon, 5 Jul 1999 01:10:31 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 05 Jul 1999 01:10:31 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA00775
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 01:10:22 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from home.ljz.net (gnus@home.ljz.net [207.198.184.200])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA05199
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 02:09:06 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost)
	by home.ljz.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA02180;
	Mon, 5 Jul 1999 02:08:56 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!<nimJxd1qyQRquvu5XTnZ:_5VE-G&4*
        EAuW"7oJLIXj'DWrJ0z@,FlwvD2PA@qhQ2R#zgsc14Klk;OSE'*;+l8p?0^nK7*
        X#0zg5wd^!M^2pg,M4Qd^{1viG;fa{}b.s[?g(x$45c]]=@'ZQ&]sPXl!u:hxBA
        v>j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM<qjGM,/6C6\|{))YWm6}Q#?3om%n8
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "05 Jul 1999 06:50:30 +0200"
Original-Lines: 22
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070091 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.91) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23837
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23837

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com> writes:
> 
> > The fact that it returned nil is indeed what broke my code, but I'm
> > wondering if this is proper.  I'm wondering if perhaps the fact that
> > it returned nil is actually a symptom of a deeper problem.
> 
> The function should never return nil, and if it does, the bug is in
> the function that returns nil.

Well ... nothing changed within my gnus configuration between versions
0.85 and 0.86, and yet, the function started returning nil at that
point.  What could be some of the causes for that?

I'll dig deeper when I have some time, but perhaps someone has some
insight into this?


-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com