From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17656 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lloyd Zusman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Correction! (Re: Pgnus-0.33: bug in "mailcap-possible-viewers") Date: 08 Oct 1998 23:08:04 -400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156318 2063 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA17256 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:10:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAF10016; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 21:39:33 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 08 Oct 1998 22:08:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA17830 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 22:08:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from ljz.asfast.net (gnus@ljz.asfast.net [205.230.75.82]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA17223 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:08:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from gnus@localhost) by ljz.asfast.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA25434; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 23:08:04 -0400 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM writes: > I found a small bug in the `mailcap-possible-viewers' routine in the > `mailcap.el' file in pgnus-0.33. The `minor' parameter sometimes gets > passed in as `nil', and this causes `string-match' to fail. I'm not > sure under what conditions this parameter gets set to `nil' ... this > might have to do with badly formed MIME headers in the message being > parsed ... ??? > > But whatever the case, the enclosed patch seems to fix the problem. > Use the `-b' option with `patch', since my `diff' program might have > have messed with the leading white space. Correction: I mean, you might have to use the `-l' option with `patch'. > [ ... ] -- Lloyd Zusman ljz@asfast.com