From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8000 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Eskilsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Time taken for nnvirtual.. Date: 24 Sep 1996 08:16:10 +0200 Sender: flognat@fukt.hk-r.se Message-ID: References: Reply-To: flognat@fukt.hk-r.se NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148234 9602 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:10:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA27697 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 00:49:08 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.fukt.hk-r.se (claymore.fukt.hk-r.se [194.47.151.20]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:17:17 +0200 Original-Received: (from flognat@localhost) by claymore.fukt.hk-r.se (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA05329; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 08:16:11 +0200 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen X-Url: http://www.pt.hk-r.se/~mpt95aes In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 23 Sep 1996 19:32:53 +0200 Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8000 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8000 / Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: | | This sounds odd. nnvirtual is slow, but not *that* slow. For | instance, I have the ~10 Emacs groups gathered in one virtual group. | It uses ~2 seconds to scan the group. Entering the group doesn't take | much time... Mmh it is quite fast on small groups, but the time to get the group seems to grow exponentially with the articles or something the like.. Any other comments/people who have tried it? /Andy -- Hi I am an alien .sig, and at the moment I am having sex to your mind, by looking at your smile I can see that you like it. Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See for more info.