From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6282
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andrew Eskilsson <mpt95aes@pt.hk-r.se>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [sgnus-0.89] compose two messages simultaneously?
Date: 20 May 1996 23:43:43 +0200
Sender: mpt95aes@pt.hk-r.se
Message-ID: <lvybmn3trk.fsf@pt.hk-r.se>
References: <199605202109.PAA25113@roberts.cdc.noaa.gov>
Reply-To: mpt95aes@pt.hk-r.se
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146761 3189 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Ding Gnus List <ding@ifi.uio.no>
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA13720 for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 20 May 1996 16:13:40 -0700
Original-Received: from jupiter.pt.hk-r.se (root@jupiter.pt.hk-r.se [194.47.132.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <XAA18541@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 20 May 1996 23:43:58 +0200
Original-Received: from epimetheus.pt.hk-r.se (mpt95aes@epimetheus.pt.hk-r.se [194.47.132.19]) by jupiter.pt.hk-r.se (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA05218; Mon, 20 May 1996 23:43:48 +0200
Original-Received: (mpt95aes@localhost) by epimetheus.pt.hk-r.se (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA01013; Mon, 20 May 1996 23:43:45 +0200
Original-To: Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov>
X-Url: http://www.pt.hk-r.se/~mpt95aes
In-Reply-To: Mark Borges's message of Mon, 20 May 1996 15:09:31 -0600
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/Emacs 19.30
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6282
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6282

/ Mark Borges <mdb@cdc.noaa.gov> wrote:
| 
| I know this functionality was what the draft concept was for, but
| that's gone now, right? Would it be a simple (and safe) thing to put
| in the ability for message mode to use another buffer, e.g.,
| `*message* <2>'?

Hopefully it is on its way back in Red (?), at the moment I use M-x
rename-uniquely if I want to compose two mails.

	/andy

-- 
 Don't walk in front of me, I might be unable to follow you.
 Don't walk after me, I might be unable to lead you.
 Just walk by my side and be my friend.