From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/3869 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy (Flognat) Eskilsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-topic open-topic indicator Date: 06 Nov 1995 17:04:31 +0100 Organization: Flognatronik Sender: mpt95aes@clark.pt.hk-r.se Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035144690 27635 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:11:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:11:30 +0000 (UTC) X-From-Line: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Mon Nov 6 09:35:00 1995 Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by miranova.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA05120 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 09:34:51 -0800 Original-Received: from sun-rise.sikt.hk-r.se (sun-rise.sikt.hk-r.se [194.47.159.11]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 17:05:16 +0100 Original-Received: from clark.hk-r.se (clark [194.47.159.24]) by sun-rise.sikt.hk-r.se (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id RAA00942 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 17:04:56 +0100 Original-Received: by clark.hk-r.se (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA01084; Mon, 6 Nov 1995 17:04:31 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: larsi@ifi.uio.no's message of 06 Nov 1995 14:32:45 +0100 Original-Lines: 10 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3869 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:3869 / larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) wrote: | | Or maybe not. Perhaps just a simple "flat" group buffer and a | "folded" one is all that we need. | It just struck me, isn't this something that the folding-mode in emacs can handle? (Don't remember the name at the moment) /andy