From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23038 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lee Willis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-summary-reply-with-original and Cc/To Date: 25 May 1999 12:37:04 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160847 32380 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:40:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA04531 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 07:37:35 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB12074; Tue, 25 May 1999 06:37:31 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 25 May 1999 06:38:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA10284 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 06:38:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (root@bfd-gate.gbdirect.co.uk [194.217.100.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA04523 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 07:37:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from gbdirect.co.uk (lee@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk [192.168.0.129]) by mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA00591 for ; Tue, 25 May 1999 12:37:05 +0100 Original-Received: (from lee@localhost) by gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA20803; Tue, 25 May 1999 12:37:05 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "J~~0'L`GfL^sW4%+i35x#X308)K/$7\]qy)UZ$`k:}Bx]6mgAA^N5,@brn/19TPn%o;j28 W7mD)UN~se8P9\3?wU.g+i9)X writes: > Kai> Isn't this the default behavior when you do a followup > Kai> without to-list and to-address? > > Doesn't seem so... Removed the to-list for this group (other.ding-devel) > and tried to reply to your mail. Only your name ended up in the header > with gnus-summary-reply-with-original. That's beacuse you did a reply not a followup as Kai suggested. Followup does what you require (F instead of R, f instead of r) gnus-summary-followup-with-original etc. etc. HTH Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"