From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22778 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lee Willis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mailcrypt Date: 23 Apr 1999 17:27:27 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <199904231606.MAA01928@jupiter.rtsq.qc.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160635 31102 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:37:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA04312 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:29:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB12740; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:29:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:29:31 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA24084 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 11:28:56 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (root@bfd-gate.gbdirect.co.uk [194.217.100.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA04263 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (lee@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk [192.168.0.129]) by mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA26205 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:27:28 +0100 Original-Received: (from lee@localhost) by landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA19135; Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:27:27 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "J~~0'L`GfL^sW4%+i35x#X308)K/$7\]qy)UZ$`k:}Bx]6mgAA^N5,@brn/19TPn%o;j28 W7mD)UN~se8P9\3?wU.g+i9)X writes: > > PH> I have PGP 5.0, and had mailcrypt working fine under emacs, but > > PH> when I went to xemacs (20.4), I get an error message when I fire > > PH> up emacs that states that it can't set version 5.0. > > > mailcrypt must be byte-compiled for the Emacs and Gnus you are using, > > otherwise it will not work. > > How could it make such a difference? I thought that running byte-compiled or > not should not make a difference, or else, I would see a bug. Don't you? I think he was implying that if you're running byte-compiled code it must be byte-compiled for the correct version of Emacs that you are using, ie you can't run a PGP compiled for emacs 19.34 with say emacs 20.3, or something to that effect rather than it being a byte-compiled versus source issue. Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"