From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19565 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lee Willis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Broken patches due to MML Date: 03 Dec 1998 10:28:12 +0000 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157892 12278 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:51:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24226 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 05:30:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA18752; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 04:29:00 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 03 Dec 1998 04:28:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA12758 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 04:28:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (root@bfd-gate.gbdirect.co.uk [194.217.100.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24213 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 05:28:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (lee@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk [192.168.0.129]) by mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA16274 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 10:28:14 GMT Original-Received: (from lee@localhost) by landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA23626; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 10:28:13 GMT Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "J~~0'L`GfL^sW4%+i35x#X308)K/$7\]qy)UZ$`k:}Bx]6mgAA^N5,@brn/19TPn%o;j28 W7mD)UN~se8P9\3?wU.g+i9)X writes: > sometimes it is really necessary to include the unspeakable > less-than-hash-part sequence verbatim. For example gnus patches: > The 0.56 patch sent over ding-patches@gnus.org was broken, because MML > munged any occurances of the forbidden word into MIME separators. Yeah, and here was me thinking it was me that was broken :) > Is this brokenness in MML, the send-patch-mechanism, or both? send-patch-mechanism (See below) > Is there a way to quote this? Does message automatically quote any > occurances inside a part I insert? There is a way to quote the part thingies which I can't actually remember at the moment, and no message doesn't automatically quote them because it is perfectly legal for you to manually insert a part definition. Therefore we're left with option b) Lars' send patch is broken as it should really look for and correctly quote the part things in patches. Still since he's given us pretty characters and pictures I'll let him off ;) Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"