From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19068
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lee Willis <lee@gbdirect.co.uk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: MIME composition, dumb question
Date: 23 Nov 1998 16:35:03 +0000
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <lzk90m4bbc.fsf@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk>
References: <199811231630.LAA09483@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157485 9673 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:44:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:44:45 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28948
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:36:24 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB07827;
	Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:36:11 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:36:05 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA13980 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:35:51 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (root@bfd-gate.gbdirect.co.uk [194.217.100.1])
	by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28925
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:35:35 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: from landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (lee@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk [192.168.0.129])
	by mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA30252
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 1998 16:35:04 GMT
Original-Received: (from lee@localhost)
	by landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA22073;
	Mon, 23 Nov 1998 16:35:04 GMT
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "J~~0'L`GfL^sW4%+i35x#X308)K/$7\]qy)UZ$`k:}Bx]6mgAA^N5,@brn/19TPn%o;j28
 W7mD)UN~se8P9\3?wU.g+i9)X<UMbOZm.'#`6?=Ui1E8cy7mC&/?v=']>7+R?ls}.ZwTx]xsol>)V^
 SJ?(e|0H6<9+u;pn<Q@j_ozt/tP#@#!guy|`;"95429mFa}3Bi2Cu|~-90',b19}%cd_Wu-h/TqxKp
 1{w,,!R)9\+1tlD~oY'
In-Reply-To: "Edward J. Sabol"'s message of "Mon, 23 Nov 1998 11:30:08 -0500"
Original-Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070053 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.53) Emacs/20.3
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19068
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19068

"Edward J. Sabol" <sabol@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:

> Excerpts from mail: (20-Nov-98) Re: MIME composition, dumb question by Dale Hagglund
> > I actually think that `C-c C-m' is easier to type the `M-o'.  From a
> > touch-typist point of view, it's not the *length* of the key sequence,
> > so much as how easy the finger movements involved are.
> 
> I like `C-c C-m' better than `M-o' as well. There's nothing particularly
> mnemonic about `M-o'.

*M*IME *O*peration ?

Erm well actually my vote is for C-c C-m as well since I use different
machines all the time and Meta is never in the same darn place ;)

Lee.
-- 
I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ...  
For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"