From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67142 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michal Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: no such article question Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:18:02 +0200 Organization: education Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215357492 28122 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2008 15:18:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 15:18:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnus-ding mailing list To: Greg Troxel Original-X-From: ding-owner+M15602@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Jul 06 17:18:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFW0v-00012E-Ef for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:18:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KFVzu-0002Nb-4F; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:17:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KFVzs-0002ND-JC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from cg-01.tenbit.pl ([213.180.131.136] helo=tenbit.pl) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KFVzo-0007ul-WA for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [87.207.144.189] (account rabbit50 HELO localhost.localdomain) by tenbit.pl (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 87749658; Sun, 06 Jul 2008 17:14:44 +0200 X-MAILER: KMail/1.7.1 In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Sun\, 06 Jul 2008 10\:21\:19 -0400") User-Agent: mozilla news reader X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67142 Archived-At: Greg Troxel writes: > So, I think your problem might be that the local gnus has a cache about > metadata for the article and is showing it, but really you've deleted > it, so when you select it fetching fails. I have the same feeling, that's why I mentioned about caching in my initial post.