From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18256 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lee Willis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Postponing messages Date: 28 Oct 1998 09:17:08 +0000 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156811 5184 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA22580 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 04:17:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB18629; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 03:17:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 28 Oct 1998 03:17:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA29337 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 03:17:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (root@bfd-gate.gbdirect.co.uk [194.217.100.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA22565 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 04:17:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (lee@landlord.gbdirect.co.uk [192.168.0.129]) by mailgate.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26084 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:17:08 GMT Original-Received: (from lee@localhost) by landlord.gbdirect.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA13078; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:17:08 GMT Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "J~~0'L`GfL^sW4%+i35x#X308)K/$7\]qy)UZ$`k:}Bx]6mgAA^N5,@brn/19TPn%o;j28 W7mD)UN~se8P9\3?wU.g+i9)X writes: > Dan Christensen writes: > > This makes sense, but I don't know whether it's worthwhile to change > this at this point. People must have gotten used to the current > naming scheme by now... But surely just because people are used to it doesn't mean that it's right? Since we're in a new development cycle thang it would make sense to change it here (If anywhere ...). Perhaps have a toggle so that people can choose which naming scheme they want? Lee. -- I was doing object-oriented assembly at 1 year old ... For some reason my mom insists on calling it "Playing with blocks"