From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86306 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: nnimap backend performances ? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:27:59 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447997378 5037 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 05:29:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 05:29:38 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34538@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Nov 20 06:29:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzeFs-0003KV-Rv for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:29:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzeF0-000884-N7; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:28:10 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzeEy-00087e-A2 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:28:08 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzeEx-0007xc-4y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:28:08 -0600 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzeEv-0000Rq-0X for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:28:05 +0100 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C472020F for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:28:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:28:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maillard.im; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=JEXk7FTMdjmfGvPlotXlee33NEs =; b=eXUjKTkPr5CBB06+En+0JlYHbdKV59LoooHKAVg54fQfSm9CTy/JDw+LAqy z7q8RuyVZ3HnTN+LfLbnlh6x20g2UD6Bt68L3bzmM6VQpAO+q6WjNaVJdYdcdoAM 3cOrwWlNA8dBFWBg5pj/WQzB6l2QNSKoyIXUy0yd7nBNLmXg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=JE Xk7FTMdjmfGvPlotXlee33NEs=; b=SkZu6CfyZMt9+1LVa9wUuwAtOnmLs9LJT8 e1kVf4GF8lart8b7i/xUK6XC8uHeYg1IXSPoh2QvKqMyPxSigfDeLjzv2k6HdY21 1rvQ3y+52+HtA03WUXK9xxLGXFEpfEifAR+OmGOntfv0zm7dssoUaVrocQpfasp/ QwQWKcOZ4= X-Sasl-enc: +yYwDaY8lu7eew6bLI+2UELokRHlPv8/wbPah4oM70nE 1447997281 Original-Received: from kcals.intra.maillard.im (areims-651-1-39-129.w86-192.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.192.194.129]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB492C016C4 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:28:01 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus (0.14), GNU Emacs 25.0.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0) X-Home-Page: https://xavier.maillard.im X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: 9983 DCA1 1FAC 8DA7 653A F9AA BA49 09B7 8F04 DE1B X-GPG: 0xBA4909B78F04DE1B X-Accept-Language: en, fr Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86306 Archived-At: Hi, Currently I am fetching my incoming mails using a fantastic tool: offlineimap. Mails are then deserved by a local imap server (dovecot) on which Gnus is connected. So far so good. As far as I can remeber, I do this from the age of stone principally because, nnimap was considered pretty slow and also because I was nomade and it was comfortable to do this. Today, is it considered harmful to fetch my mail in "direct connect" to my remote imap server ? -- Xavier.