From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44561 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Malcolm Purvis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Wanted: Gnus plugin to submit spam to ordb.org Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:11:23 +1000 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <03662adav5.fsf@colargol.tihlde.org> <87pu0ijyrq.fsf@strauser.com> <87lmb6jxju.fsf@strauser.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020255185 11358 127.0.0.1 (1 May 2002 12:13:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172syn-0002wy-00 for ; Wed, 01 May 2002 14:13:05 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 172sxi-0007xn-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 07:11:58 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 01 May 2002 07:12:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA07387 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 07:11:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 3838 invoked by alias); 1 May 2002 12:11:33 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 3833 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 12:11:33 -0000 Original-Received: from mail020.syd.optusnet.com.au (210.49.20.135) by gnus.org with SMTP; 1 May 2002 12:11:33 -0000 Original-Received: from co3018576-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au (c17274.rivrw2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.28.52.134]) by mail020.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g41CBFP28603 for ; Wed, 1 May 2002 22:11:16 +1000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: "t>8w.Nd-q:ml[PuI`{tr%l5Y~,sBj?fR1G.q`GM6)3RK+ll4EOE_1Goun~_6nt.5q,rU]` Q,Kxq+|~kZdSuw`3)>5+_/EcS2MS={U]o-eU!y?G(&'dd~\jX|faymzH|72n4oPxOu8c0M2FroLHaA g%#ZHX\p3dIud>Y'+?-@!Om%Z(D2.Fp<*bS8W2Q'{*"WmzMrRZj%)1=|J#3:[`vYdisIP7:`as5Qku ,M(VrTIClqxpH4Z7,_$?ugTWyMq=DQjGEP*M4*/S{Ym{,uq')-b@i_ECSi;Gq+Z[I=kdtX In-Reply-To: (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:39:25 -0400") Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley, ppc-unknown-linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44561 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44561 >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: Ted> From the lack of an outcry, and from yours and Kai's comments, I guess Ted> everyone is OK with having the 'spam' mark trigger the spam actions. If you mean by this that the act of applying the mark triggers the spam actions, I must delurk to raise an objection. I think that the proper behavior for the spam mark would be something like the expire one. It should do nothing until the group is quit and then something like report-as-spam-and-expire is run on all marked articles before the expire process is run. In addition, any article that is split using the spam rule should also get this mark automatically. This combination should give the user a straightforward method for reporting spam as well as maximum flexibility for dealing with false positives and exceptional cases. Malcolm -- Malcolm Purvis The hidden, terrible cost of nuclear warfare is Really Bad Public Art. - Angus McIntyre, alt.peeves, 13/3/02.