From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/40014 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: (unknown) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 07:25:22 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175631 31029 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:47:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 19595 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2001 15:28:26 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2001 15:28:26 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 160ldm-0002L7-00; Mon, 05 Nov 2001 09:26:22 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 05 Nov 2001 09:25:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA12062 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:25:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 19545 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2001 15:26:00 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 19540 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2001 15:25:58 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp.newsguy.com (HELO newsguy.com) (209.155.56.71) by gnus.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2001 15:25:58 -0000 Original-Received: from reader.local.lan (66.51.210.228.dslextreme.com [66.51.210.228] (may be forged)) by newsguy.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA87528 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:25:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from reader@localhost) by reader.local.lan (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fA5FPNU12183; Mon, 5 Nov 2001 07:25:23 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: reader.local.lan: reader set sender to reader@newsguy.com using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 56 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40014 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40014 Subject: Re: Is this a buglet.. nndrafts:draft renegades References: <20011102214600.0ED71BD48@squeaker.lickey.com> <2nk7x7vr6n.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <20011103193251.CBC04BD25@squeaker.lickey.com> <87ady3ef1u.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> From: Harry Putnam In-Reply-To: (Per Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 11:53:46 +0100") Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 07:24:38 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Per Abrahamsen writes: > Harry Putnam writes: > >> In the sense that a composition is a file, C-x k does kill the file >> and data is lost in every other usage. > > Does `C-x k' really any already generated autosave file? If so, I > agree it should do the same for composition buffers. If not, I > believe it shouldn't do it for composition buffers either. M-x cd test_dir C-x C-f tnew Type: Testing the action of C-x k on new composition buffer of tnew before an auto-save has occured C-x d (gone without a trace) Type: Testing the action of C-x k on new composition buffer of tnew after an auto-save has occured excerpt from *Nessages* Auto-saving...done C-x d g (cong without a trace) That is the behavior I see. And I agree that a new message composition should behave the same.