From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23537 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dsg@mitre.org (David S. Goldberg) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Being forced to deal with message numbers and frustrated Date: 24 Jun 1999 16:41:05 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4jywvwuyde2.fsf_-_@homeworld.Eng.Sun.Com> <4jyu2rx77at.fsf@homeworld.Eng.Sun.Com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161252 2551 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:47:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA16850 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:43:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB02185; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:41:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:42:23 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20625 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 15:42:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from linus.mitre.org (linus.mitre.org [129.83.10.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA16787 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from blackbird.mitre.org (blackbird [129.83.65.14]) by linus.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA05538 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:41:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from dsg@localhost) by blackbird.mitre.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA22271; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:41:07 -0400 (EDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List X-Face: GUaHTH@nS>[7,ME@-gYZ4#Wl{z"99k@[[Y8AcP0x1paqu.,z9,XSV1WI>{q3f6^e5(zrit <4fV&VHhmE`uidRqtmG27;si9&r;#KSF~E#$%W8w(xdp)H4tW=\2XOk~3=@oGqqpj;m4xf Ow;y26396&,34@9#~4;@*S;E0cq"LM9N(us4P%F(Nxis'Vvfm9?KufH;:Q$dMa-QWGLR&K d0`LJZE8xb*>^yN>b]_NcU:E=Zn\1=#/(OS2 In-Reply-To: Tony Lam's message of "24 Jun 1999 12:00:26 -0700" Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070088 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.88) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23537 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23537 > The only consistent way to archive articles in place with mails and > news is to use "*" to cache them. Would it not be consistent if you used `?' to archive instead of `*'? > The only workaround is to settle down for two interfaces for > archiving in mails and news: '?' for nnfolder group and '*' for nntp > group (passive caching) and keep reminding myself which backend I'm > using. I set gnus-use-cache to t and have gnus-uncacheable-groups set to "^nnml". I use then use `?' to archive for both mail and news. I barely notice the extra `*' on summary lines for archived nntp messages. -- Dave Goldberg Post: The Mitre Corporation\MS B325\202 Burlington Rd.\Bedford, MA 01730 Phone: 781-271-3887 Email: dsg@mitre.org