From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/43404 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: attachments in S/MIME encrypted messages Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:43:08 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035178502 17415 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:35:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 4540 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 16:45:32 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 16:45:32 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16hvaH-0007yY-00; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 10:45:09 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 04 Mar 2002 10:45:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA20302 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:44:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 4520 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2002 16:44:51 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4515 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 16:44:51 -0000 Original-Received: from smtpproxy2.mitre.org (198.76.173.29) by gnus.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 16:44:51 -0000 Original-Received: from avsrv2.mitre.org (avsrv2.mitre.org [128.29.154.4]) by smtpproxy2.mitre.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g24Gio522220 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:44:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from MAILHUB2 (mailhub2.mitre.org [129.83.221.18]) by smtpsrv2.mitre.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g24GinJ13750 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:44:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from blackbird.mitre.org (129.83.10.221) by mailhub2.mitre.org with SMTP id 9430390; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:43:28 -0500 Original-To: The Gnus Mailing List X-Face: GUaHTH@nS>[7,ME@-gYZ4#Wl{z"99k@[[Y8AcP0x1paqu.,z9,XSV1WI>{q3f6^e5(zrit <4fV&VHhmE`uidRqtmG27;si9&r;#KSF~E#$%W8w(xdp)H4tW=\2XOk~3=@oGqqpj;m4xf Ow;y26396&,34@9#~4;@*S;E0cq"LM9N(us4P%F(Nxis'Vvfm9?KufH;:Q$dMa-QWGLR&K d0`LJZE8xb*>^yN>b]_NcU:E=Zn\1=#/(OS2 In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:36:06 +0200") Original-Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, sparc-sun-solaris2.7) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43404 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:43404 >>>>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:36:06 +0200, Simon Josefsson >>>>> said: Resurecting a dead horse... > david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes: >> I just tried it on XEmacs 21.1.14 under cygwin, which I rarely use or >> I'd have thought of it before, and it mostly worked right once I got >> all the cert files properly mirrored on my laptop. The verification >> process claimed forgery even on messages I sent and signed myself but >> the resulting article buffer was properly buttonized. I'm in the >> process of upgrading XEmacs for Solaris to see if that solves the >> buttonizing problem there, and if so I'll check on the verification >> thing. I'm running openssl 0.9.5 under cygwin which may be an issue >> there. > There _is_ a CRLF bug in Gnus (I just became aware of this), but it is > in the encoding part, so shouldn't affect this. I have little time to > look at this now, but hopefully a interoperability testing project > with the various open mail clients could be started soon, then we > should be able to detect these problems better. I finally upgraded to XEmacs 21.4.6. I discovered that there's a new (or at least newly documented) option to configure called --with-file-coding which I enabled on Sun (it's on by default under cygwin) and that solves the CRLF issues. Encrypted emails are properly parsed under both Sun and cygwin now. I still get a "Sender address forged" message in the button of a decrypted message in spite of openssl clearly getting successful verification, but that's much less of a concern since clicking the button provides me that info. Thanks, -- Dave Goldberg david.goldberg6@verizon.net