From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/42730 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-agent-regenerate Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:28:37 -0800 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <2nhep6codd.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> <2nu1t6b29v.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177931 13388 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:25:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 8990 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 00:31:25 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 00:31:25 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 16VMB7-00078L-00; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:31:13 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:31:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA12832 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:30:58 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 8963 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2002 00:30:55 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8958 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 00:30:55 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp.newsguy.com (HELO newsguy.com) (209.155.56.71) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 00:30:55 -0000 Original-Received: from reader.local.lan (adsl-66.51.210.228.dslextreme.com [66.51.210.228]) by newsguy.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA36610 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:30:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from reader@localhost) by reader.local.lan (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0T0UOI26986; Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:30:24 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: reader.local.lan: reader set sender to reader@newsguy.com using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <2nu1t6b29v.fsf@zsh.cs.rochester.edu> (ShengHuo ZHU's message of "Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:21:00 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1.80 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) Original-Lines: 34 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42730 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:42730 ShengHuo ZHU writes: >> I ran C-u M-x g-a-r and the regeneration began, reporting which >> group it was fixing as it went.... did I run with the `clean' option >> or not? > > Yes, you ran it with 'clean' option. Ok, thanks >>>> Further, can this command be aimed at a specific group like >>>> nnml-generate-nov... can. ..... >> >> So I guess the answer to this was a no..eh? > > Eh, the answer is a no so far. He he... You are spoiling everybody with your fast work.. Those `Fixed' messages of yours are becoming a trademark. I noticed something when running that command as described. It was pretty fast. I'm comparing to running nnml-generate-nov-databases. I don't mean an actual benchmark type comparison but just a noticable difference. And there are currently approximately 3 times as many messages under News than Mail News = 33331 Mail = 10456 I just moved lots of stuff to archives a week ago. Yet the g-a-r command finished in a few seconds ..maybe 10 or so. Is there a reason it would be much faster than nnml-generate-nov...? Or is it the clean option making such a difference?