From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/41810
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Is there a new agent bug?
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 19:39:36 -0800
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m1g05ex4av.fsf@reader.newsguy.com>
References: <m1hepvpgsr.fsf@reader.newsguy.com>
	<vafvgeb9zne.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035177148 8076 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 05:12:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 05:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: (qmail 10468 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 04:25:52 -0000
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13)
  by mastaler.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 04:25:52 -0000
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 16OWmf-0006eI-00; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 22:25:45 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 09 Jan 2002 22:25:37 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA19732
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:25:24 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 10462 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2002 04:25:27 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 10457 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 04:25:27 -0000
Original-Received: from smtp.newsguy.com (HELO newsguy.com) (209.155.56.71)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 04:25:27 -0000
Original-Received: from reader.local.lan (adsl-66.51.210.228.dslextreme.com [66.51.210.228])
	by newsguy.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA43977
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:24:58 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: (from reader@localhost)
	by reader.local.lan (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0A4Ov009249;
	Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:24:57 -0800
Original-To: <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: <vafvgeb9zne.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's
 message of "Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:56:21 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) Emacs/21.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu)
Original-Lines: 17
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41810
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:41810

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
>
>> First thing I noticed was that our gnu had shed his red coat and grew
>> a white one.... Has that been changed or is this the first indicator
>> of some local screw up?
>
> Well, it _is_ Oort Gnus now.  And the pictures of Oort are not really
> so red.
>
> It's cool, it's far-out, it's Oort!

But it ort to be red..

After all the parts that are going away from us are supposed to be
red-shifted.  Or Mr. Doppler will turn over in his grave.