From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: Prevent B c/B m from createing dups in target group
Date: 17 Aug 2001 12:25:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1hev64hok.fsf@reader.newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r8uav7re.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 20:52:37 +0200")
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
>
> > With that warning mechanism in place, and provision to copy/move only
> > the unique messages on command, a user could simply throw a batch of
> > messages at a directory and only the unique stuff would stick...
>
> Yeah. But there is no predefined functionality in Gnus for doing
> this..
My OP was asking for an outline of how to go about starting to create
that functionality in gnus. Once finished it could hopefully be
submitted for consideration as an inclusion.
I'm pretty sure once this kind of functionality became known it would
be seen as a nice addition.
> and I think it sounds like something of a non-problem. :-)
> When you suppress duplicate messages on group entry, you usually just
> see one copy in any case, no matter how many are actually there...
Possibly it is a non-problem but I see at least a few problems with
that approach:
1) In the event I have edited the first copy in some way. Then later
looking back at old threads I see that same message not realizing
I've already copied and edited it to a save group. I copy it again
but being in a hurry neglect to edit it. Which one will show up
when duplicate suppression on entry is engaged?
2) I run up on an old thread in a Newsgroup. Maybe a discussion of
`sender' and RFC provisions and decide I'd like to keep the whole
thing... all 235 : ) messages. I've already piece meal saved 70,
not necessaryily in order. I just throw the whole batch into a
saved group, now I have at least 70 dups. Do I want that overhead?
When I might possible be able to write something for gnus that
would allow me to do that and only actually move the unique ones on
my request.
3) Suppression seems very much like taking pain pills to mask an
injury while continuing to grind your body to dust...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-17 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-17 15:40 Harry Putnam
2001-08-17 17:28 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 18:20 ` Harry Putnam
2001-08-17 18:52 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 18:58 ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-17 19:01 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 19:08 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 19:21 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 19:45 ` Harry Putnam
2001-08-17 19:25 ` Harry Putnam [this message]
2001-08-17 19:40 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 19:47 ` Paul Jarc
2001-08-17 20:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2001-08-17 20:35 ` Harry Putnam
2001-08-17 19:09 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-17 19:55 ` Harry Putnam
2001-08-17 20:50 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-08-19 15:57 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1hev64hok.fsf@reader.newsguy.com \
--to=reader@newsguy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).