From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59129 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Change in bytecomp.el breaks Gnus Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:21:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877jouepy8.fsf@telia.com> <200411111745.iABHji207636@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <871xezbtyh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100409746 10027 80.91.229.6 (14 Nov 2004 05:22:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 05:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Luc Teirlinck , ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 14 06:22:17 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CTCq8-0005VC-00 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 06:22:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTCyl-0004sC-U3 for gebp-emacs-pretest-bug@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTCyk-0004s7-E8 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTCyk-0004rv-0X for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTCyj-0004rs-Ss for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.164] (helo=simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTCpZ-0004bP-AI for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:21:41 -0500 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.71.119.89]) by simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041114052140.LAKO1597.simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:21:40 -0500 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 48BCE367341; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 00:21:41 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Katsumi Yamaoka In-Reply-To: (Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:14:41 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: emacs-pretest-bug.gnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-pretest-bug-bounces+gebp-emacs-pretest-bug=gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:4644 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59129 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59129 > (if (fboundp 'message) > (defalias 'foo 'message) > (defalias 'foo 'ignore)) (defalias 'foo (if (fboundp 'message) 'message 'ignore)) > If it is normal, we will have to use `eval-and-compile' to > surround similar `defalias' forms in many places. Yuck. Why do people feel like it's better to use ugly hacks than to get a few warnings ? Stefan