Re: Is this a buglet.. nndrafts:draft renegades

[Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>]

[ NOTE sorry if this proves to be redundant but somehow I am getting
an unusual behavior here.  Posted a message just like this one a few
minutes ago but it appeared in an unexpected format on ding.
See Message-ID: <m18zdlb5qh.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id>

(I think Samuel or someone already posted on this and its cvs cured
problem I hope.... I'll be cvs updating shortly)]

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
>
>> In the sense that a composition is a file, C-x k does kill the file
>> and data is lost in every other usage. 
>
> Does `C-x k' really any already generated autosave file?  If so, I
> agree it should do the same for composition buffers.  If not, I
> believe it shouldn't do it for composition buffers either.

M-x cd 
test_dir <RET>

C-x C-f tnew

Type:
Testing the action of C-x k on new composition buffer of tnew
before an auto-save has occured
<C-x k yes>

C-x d <RET> (gone without a trace)

Type:
Testing the action of C-x k on new composition buffer of tnew
after an auto-save has occured
<waiting>
excerpt from *Nessages*
        Auto-saving...done

<C-x k yes>

C-x d <RET> g 
(cong without a trace)

That is the behavior I see.  And I agree that a new message
composition should behave the same.