From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75883 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francis Moreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: when customizing posting-style my emails become SPAMS Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:07:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hdudxb5.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295899655 32249 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2011 20:07:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24234@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jan 24 21:07:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PhShD-0002YF-G1 for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:07:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PhSh4-0005na-Qx; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:07:18 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PhSh0-0005nO-JQ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:07:14 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhSgz-0002ov-IB for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:07:14 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PhSgy-0002Gv-NC for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so4570717wyf.17 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vN6lV1/1smLvX/pIfzPW1l03HUNxxXX6Nej4lP5QA1I=; b=g/r/XJUQ+j0zMrYWPK31njBHh/k8+HqZLsxQJp/nLPSxFcfleIt9valyk0JiMBgBOB q8jtoPiK8jhUGFB6Z8QQ7Yz7DPBYhQmq2f9FTR4v6fIxwywcw1T1YIJNBVx3NirG3f8z +fwieyuND46TJOjwy52jcDEmOZ93PIWzyVz10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=MyQspkcHFWdnHnDW5F2g9CNxgKkeVqTUnQ1wUdfdnN5I0MZl1BotLLfXhgmuXs5Ny5 r+yjChdFrRJwky0N81mZjShDPpzKBcu+17xV2KXmv/LSw5MSRfbAIjWNiGxEEwWoAF44 JrgYnUHMwoJ4zTC4dCOiduPaTvbAyLCGZ6cQI= Original-Received: by 10.216.90.79 with SMTP id d57mr2763901wef.65.1295899626955; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (au213-1-82-235-205-153.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.205.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o33sm6767603wej.37.2011.01.24.12.07.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:07:04 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: Ted Zlatanov , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <877hdudxb5.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:30:06 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75883 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:48:31 +0100 Francis Moreau wrote: > > FM> I customize a group like the following > > FM> (setq gnus-parameters > FM> '(("nnimap\\+home:INBOX" > FM> (gcc-self . t) > FM> (gnus-large-newsgroup nil) > FM> (eval (setq message-sendmail-extra-arguments '("-a" "home"))) > FM> (posting-style > FM> (name "Francis Moreau") > FM> (address "fmoreau@gmail.com"))))) > > FM> After setting 'address', my smtp server consider all my emails I sent as > FM> SPAMS. > > FM> If I remove 'address', it works fine. > > FM> Could anybody tell me what's going on ? > > My guess is that you're authenticated to the server as another address > and overriding that is triggering some anti-SPAM rule on the server. Unfortunately not, actually it's even worth than that: if I change the address to some other value, it works ! -- Francis