From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57037 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Green Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: emulating mozilla's Label command Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:01:58 -0400 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4noepxs0fo.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> <87n05hnny5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <4nad1fq4ja.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> <4nk70hav21.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082059358 21186 80.91.224.253 (15 Apr 2004 20:02:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5577@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Apr 15 22:02:24 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BED44-0004hs-00 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 22:02:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BED3q-00015d-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:02:10 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BED3l-00015T-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BED3l-0005OY-8K for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from host49.ipowerweb.com (host49.ipowerweb.com [12.129.198.139]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E464B3A005A for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:02:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from pool-151-196-19-226.balt.east.verizon.net ([151.196.19.226] helo=localhost.dok.org) by host49.ipowerweb.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1BED3d-0007da-00 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:01:57 -0700 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <4nk70hav21.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:40:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host49.ipowerweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnus.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dok.org Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57037 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57037 Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, cmg@dok.org wrote: >> I glanced at the registry and it seems separating out the parent >> threading functions from what directories the registry actually >> watches might be desirable. > > I don't understand, sorry. (defcustom gnus-registry-unfollowed-groups '("delayed" "drafts" "queue") "List of groups that gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent won't follow. The group names are matched, they don't have to be fully qualified." :group 'gnus-registry :type '(repeat string)) I could see not wanting splitting to follow those directories but being able to label an article an article in drafts as a TODO task and then pull that task out for as below. >> It looks like the registry cache's enough to make the display of >> labels straight from the registry easy. Would the searching of the >> registry for all things having a "label" data be prohibitive? > > Yes, but why would you? You just need to look up the article of > interest by message ID. Wes Hardaker's thread about: Wes> What I'd like would be a thread summary something like (badly Wes> drawn, sorry): Wes> Wes> imap Wes> \- inbox Wes> \- family Wes> - Go to Mom's at 9 Wes> - Help sister with her computer Wes> \- work Wes> - Write boss Wes> \- project1 Wes> - submit report Wes> Wes> But the cool thing would be if each of the topics actually came Wes> from a group name (imap.inbox, imap.inbox.family, imap.work, Wes> imap.work.project1), ... And if all the data was auto-gathered Wes> from a specified list of folders to work on. I'm convinced that the right hooks could create that later by just storing the msgids that have labels. Thanks Ted for the info on the registry, I'll update to CVS gnus and try it out and see if I can get some summary commands working. -- Chris Green To err is human, to moo bovine.