From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9353 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: infloops with nnfolder+archive [was: Re: Red Gnus v0.78 is released] Date: 09 Jan 1997 14:42:47 -0800 Sender: steve@altair.xemacs.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149391 17961 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:29:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA08249 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:46:48 -0800 Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 23:32:46 +0100 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA01596; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:42:48 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ X-Attribution: sb In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 09 Jan 1997 13:38:43 -0800 Original-Lines: 44 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 20.0 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9353 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9353 >>>>> "David" == David Moore writes: >>>>> "Danny" == Danny Siu writes: I wrote: sb> For whatever it's worth, v0.78 still infloops[1] whenever it attempts sb> to deal with the nnfolder+archive server on XEmacs. This problem did sb> not exist versions in v0.72 and earlier. Danny> Is this bug fixed yet? I am still using the old rgnus-0.66 Danny> because of this bug.... Technically speaking, no. But look at my X-Mailer: header. :-) David> The bug is that an older Gnus was placing messages into your David> nnfolder without quoting `From ' lines inside of other David> messages. David> You can fix it manually by editing your archive folder, David> searching for `^From ', and changing ones that aren't really at David> the beginning of a true message to '>From '. Yup. In the end, it took me about 10 minutes to go through 20 megabytes of mail folders. Interactive regexp searching is pretty fast, even when you're doubling checking everything. David> It's hard to fix this automagically, although you could maybe David> use a heuristic since it seems that the real ones are followed David> by my Sender line in my archive at least. Mine too, but aren't the saved headers user customizable? In nnfolder+archive, the backend I had trouble with, the only valid `From ' lines all start off `From nobody'. David> Current gnus properly sticks the '>' before any embedded `From ' David> lines. So you shouldn't have to go through this again. I hope so. But who knows what the early versions of Mamey Sapote Gnus will do? :-) -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. "That Bill Clinton. He probably doesn't know how to log on to the Internet." -- Rush Limbaugh, noted Computer Expert