From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9331
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: nnfolder comments (may apply to other backends too)
Date: 09 Jan 1997 12:10:07 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m220bvumsw.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <bywwtormo4.fsf@loewner.math.ethz.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149373 17845 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:29:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id DAA06203 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 03:36:28 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp15.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.115]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <MAA07874@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:24:11 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id MAA07518; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:10:10 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of 08 Jan 1997 20:28:59 +0100
Original-Lines: 24
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9331
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9331

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:

> 1. Shouldn't nnfolder-generate-active-file ignore files with extention
>   nnmail-procmail-suffix ? 

I don't think so...

>   Is there a nnfolder-regenerate-active-file command wich just
>   recomputes the nummers?

Nope.

> 2. I tried to use a compressed nnfolder file by gzip'ing one of my
>    folders. As I sort of expected it didn't work. It seems you have
>    rename the folder blabla.gz. May be it is a good idea to have a
>    nnfolder-also-try-extensions to be used by nnfolder-group-pathname?
>    Of course nnfolder-generate-active-file would have to strip these
>    extensions off files too.

Yes, this should happen automatically.  It's on the todo list.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen