From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10041
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Group highlighting
Date: 01 Mar 1997 01:01:24 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m23eugwkdn.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <x2ene29r41.fsf@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149973 22003 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:39:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:39:33 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA06375
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 17:11:49 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp14.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.114]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA19851@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 01:48:48 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id BAA21358; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 01:01:31 +0100
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Jens Lautenbacher's message of 27 Feb 1997 16:59:58 +0100
Original-Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.16/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10041
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10041

Jens Lautenbacher <jens@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de> writes:

> There seem to be some inconsitencies with the way groups lines are
> highlighted. 
> 
> As far as I see there are two incompatible ways to do this:
> 
> a) using custom gnus-face-x fonts in the gnus-group-line-format.
> 
> b) by a call to gnus-group-highlight-line, which is on by default, and
>    which uses gnus-group-highlight to see how a particular line should
>    be highlighted.
> 
> The problem is that first a) is done and then, if it is selected, b).
> But b) overwrites any (face) changes done by a).

Yes, this is a problem.  Uhm.  The fontification done by A can't be
done after B, since it's actually done while inserting the text.
Uhm.  Well, perhaps the `gnus-group-highlight-line' should be
rewritten to be done before inserting anything in the buffer, so that
we know what the default face is supposed to be before inserting any
of the text?  I don't know whether that's workable...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen