From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9600
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: OffGnus
Date: 24 Jan 1997 10:28:54 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m23evrs9pl.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <m24tgixw4e.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7vi8sml4c.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2ybdnpgol.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7915n3v8w.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2915mprnd.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7sp3tu40i.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2ybdl3xwd.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <x7g1zsiae3.fsf@gkar.asds.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149600 19402 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:33:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA17265
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 01:55:30 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex34.uio.no [129.240.154.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA18091@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:30:51 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id KAA06667; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:28:56 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Rich Pieri's message of 23 Jan 1997 12:12:04 -0500
Original-Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.84/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9600
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9600

Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> writes:

> LMI> Perhaps it won't be necessary, though, since the cancel messages are
> LMI> usually posted to the same group(s) that the articles appeared in,
> 
> No, cmsgs are posted to the "control" group.

The Newsgroups header of cancel messages are normally identical to the
Newsgroups header of the message to be canceled.  This is done to
facilitate distributing the relevant cancel messages to the sites that
need it.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen