From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9560
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Round two of requests for new optional methods.
Date: 23 Jan 1997 03:43:19 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m23evt5cxk.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <vpdafq330wk.fsf@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <m2afq2prt6.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <vpd20bennb5.fsf@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149566 19193 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:32:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:32:46 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA13320
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 19:21:21 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex06.uio.no [129.240.154.26]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <EAA26239@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 04:02:43 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA03694; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 03:43:20 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu's message of 22 Jan 1997 03:09:34 -0500
Original-Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.83/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9560
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9560

visigoth@naiad.fac.cs.cmu.edu writes:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
> 
> > > * add nnchoke-request-new-message-count
> > I can add that, I guess-
> 
> Ahh.  Thanks much!  That single method will make it -sooo- much easier
> to work with IMAP.  

It'll require some tippy-footing in the group buffer generation code,
since it'll have to bypass the normal calculation methods.

> > Or nnimap could just ignore that call, and we could add a new function
> > to be called at group entry.
> 
> Either would be fine for me.  Is anything using the current method?

nnvirtual does.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen