From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9178
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Feature request: display group parameter
Date: 11 Dec 1996 01:24:25 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m23exe0vye.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <qk2hgm2211j.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <m2hgm0red2.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <qk2zpzs2hw4.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <m2g21j6guv.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <qk2hglw169x.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149242 16919 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:27:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id RAA22242 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 17:56:02 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp18.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.118]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <CAA19471@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 02:42:14 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id BAA28351; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 01:24:26 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch's message of 09 Dec 1996 09:16:58 +0100
Original-Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.75/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9178
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9178

Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch writes:

> Which didn't work...  First off, I think make-local-hook also needs a
> call to make-local-variable as well, but I'm not positive...

No, that's not necessary.

> What happens is that gnus-summary-limit-exclude-marks gets run and
> then the summary buffer gets re-generated and
> gnus-summary-prepare-hook gets run once again!  (ie, inf loop).

Uhm, ah.  Yes.  Uhm...  You could remove the expirable articles from
the `gnus-newsgroup-limit' list "by hand".

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen