* warp-to-article refactoring
@ 2011-10-07 9:43 Dave Abrahams
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Abrahams @ 2011-10-07 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
I'm about to do a bit of copy/paste programming from
nnir-warp-to-article, and it bothers me. It looks to me like almost all
of nnir-warp-to-article ought to be in gnus-warp-to-article, and in fact
the thing that ought to be a "group function" instead of warp-to-article
is something more like get-article-origin, returning a
group-id/article-id pair.
The question is what kind of patch to submit upstream. Do we need to
preserve warp-to-article as a hook, or is it OK to break the (maybe) one
user-written backend out there that implements it? If not, I can
preserve it for backward compatibility, but the refactoring is going to
be a lot messier.
TIA,
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-10-07 9:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-07 9:43 warp-to-article refactoring Dave Abrahams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).