From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79892 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dave Abrahams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Slow "/ o" Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:55:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315699001 28590 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2011 23:56:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28186@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 11 01:56:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R2XPY-000257-4z for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:56:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2XP7-0000ch-IA; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:56:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2XP5-0000cN-W8 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R2XP4-0008FE-KP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R2XP3-00068g-40; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:56:05 +0200 Original-Received: by vxj14 with SMTP id 14so1539862vxj.17 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.52.22.83 with SMTP id b19mr1020319vdf.33.1315698958562; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pluto.luannocracy.com (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bl5sm7528651vdc.2.2011.09.10.16.55.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by pluto.luannocracy.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id E6C2EE6EABF; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 19:55:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:28:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (darwin) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79892 Archived-At: on Sat Sep 10 2011, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dave Abrahams writes: > >> In this group with 2267 messages I did "/ o" and it took... well, a lot >> longer than I expected. The elp profiling results are below. It looks >> to my layman's eye like the bulk of the time goes into thread sorting. >> Am I doing something wrong? Is my setting for >> gnus-thread-sort-functions a particularly expensive one? > > Does `2267 RET' on the group take as long as `/ o'? It's slightly faster. It's roughly 20 seconds to do `/ o' and 17 for `2267 RET' -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com