From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25292 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Epprecht Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: scoring interface Date: 25 Sep 1999 07:43:36 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162704 13214 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:11:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA08822 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 01:55:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAB19842; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 00:55:47 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 25 Sep 1999 00:56:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13262 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 00:55:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mail.sunweb.ch ([195.141.237.254]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA08807 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 01:53:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pc.home [212.90.193.54] by mail.sunweb.ch with ESMTP (SMTPD32-4.03) id A1817A060094; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 05:53:53 +03d00 Original-Received: (from epprecht@localhost) by pc.home (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA00481; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 07:43:36 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25292 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:25292 I like Gnus interface to the scoring rules very much. WIBNI there would be a way of *removing* scoring rules as easy as you add them. So after doing 'I r r t' on the ancestor of a interesting thread we could do something like 'R r' when the thread goes to much OT and gnus would ask about removing the corresponding matching scoring rule? So we could *I*ncrease, *L*ower and *R*emove. Or the *Score Trace* buffer could be used for that? Robert Epprecht