From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11914 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: SL Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: what the hell is this? Date: 17 Aug 1997 09:41:24 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8767t7vzvo.fsf@phaedrus.uchicago.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151546 760 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:05:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA07892 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 12:01:55 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA22576 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 13:57:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 18:36:51 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 20153 invoked by uid 504); 17 Aug 1997 16:36:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 20150 invoked from network); 17 Aug 1997 16:36:49 -0000 Original-Received: from xemacs.miranova.com (HELO altair.xemacs.org) (steve@206.190.83.19) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 17 Aug 1997 16:36:49 -0000 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) id JAA02861; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 09:41:24 -0700 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: `'%\i;ySOu]g?NlziJSk_$&@]KP`}~PEQPjZ5;nxSaDW_o$4+4%Ab]%Ifw3ZR;7TIT3,O,' @2{L;]ox6kc;$_5kU'n**9vFg-]eV~GbxSVCx|(s%uR[],*:^WKmC`B}(;|k9/m]gwt?&`t;^rfCJg khHH>pP1W\)xM0U@!FNDD72{3fDP$PkBhx^7Z?-WxH6DbFN:QOnT`llzW}VGdYv;n9lzljQvKTIBhQ YuV X-Attribution: sb In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "17 Aug 1997 09:27:56 -0600" Original-Lines: 39 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.64/XEmacs 20.3(beta19) - "Kiev" Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11914 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11914 Jason R Mastaler writes: > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> Hm. Could I complain to Internic and get them to revoke gnus.com and >> gnus.net? That is, if we wanted to? (Perhaps we don't.) What would >> it take? At least a trademark on the name `Gnus', it appears. > Probably legal action if they didn't want to give them up. The > InterNIC doesn't settle these type of disputes. > The NSI Domain Name Dispute Policy Statement explains more about this: > http://rs.internic.net/domain-info/internic-domain-6.html The highlights are: - Network Solutions does not act as arbiter of disputes. * Section 5(b): Before requesting Network Solutions to take action pursuant to the Policy, trademark owners are required to notify domain name registrants that their registration and use of the domain name violates the legal rights of the trademark owner. * Section 7: In those instances when either the domain name registrant or the trademark owner file suit against the other regarding the registration and use of the domain name prior to the domain name being placed on <93>Hold,<94> Network Solutions will not place the domain name on <93>Hold<94> and will deposit control of the domain name into the registry of the court. * Section 7(c): Network Solutions will abide by all court orders without being named as a party to a law suit. > Perhaps it would be better to give Mr. Magnus Brannstrom a phone call > and inquire about his intentions for the two domains? That's worth a try.