From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10095
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: letting message-signature-file be a function
Date: 06 Mar 1997 04:53:45 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m24tephe0m.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <199703051440.IAA22666@rs5.tcs.tulane.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150022 22359 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:40:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:40:22 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA16498
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 21:07:15 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp19.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.119]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <FAA23018@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 05:57:17 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id EAA01622; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 04:53:46 +0100
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: "St. Suika Roberts"'s message of Wed, 5 Mar 1997 08:40:08 -0600
Original-Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.19/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10095
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10095

"St. Suika Roberts" <wrobert2@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu> writes:

> IWBNI the documentation also mentioned that one needs to set
> message-signature-file to nil if one wants to have message-signature be
> a function.  It took me longer than I thought it should to figure out
> that that was why I was getting double signatures when I first set
> message-signature to call my sigrandomizer and insert the text instead
> of changing the contents of ~/.signature (which speeded things up a
> little bit).

The `message-signature' function is *not* supposed to insert anything
anywhere -- it should return (as a string) the signature that's to be
inserted.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen