From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9602
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: OffGnus
Date: 24 Jan 1997 10:25:09 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m24tg7s9vu.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <m24tgixw4e.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7vi8sml4c.fsf@gkar.asds.com> <x7wwt84037.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2vi8rpglq.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7buaj3w3e.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2hgkapye8.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7ohei3at7.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m220bepqnp.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> 	<x7vi8pu4jw.fsf@gkar.asds.com> 	<m2zpy13y19.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <x7iv4oiash.fsf@gkar.asds.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149601 19413 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:33:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:33:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA17274
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 02:00:29 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex34.uio.no [129.240.154.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA18126@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:31:05 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id KAA06664; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:25:10 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Rich Pieri's message of 23 Jan 1997 12:03:26 -0500
Original-Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.84/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9602
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9602

Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> writes:

> Up to this point we agree.  What I want is an additional check on the
> length of the article, after the first round of scoring is performed.
> If the article is bigger than some length, regardless of score, it
> should not be automatically downloaded.

No, if you don't want long articles, then you just lower the score of
the long articles.

> I do not want "your" 1284-line article scored low; but I neither do I
> want to automatically download it, because I am on a 14.4Kb modem link.
> I do want it to appear in its "proper" place in the summary buffer.

The download scores are orthogonal to the display scores.  If you want
them to be.  They'll probably be most useful accumulative, so that you
basically add a download score file to the normal score files when
downloading. 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen