From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9158 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problem with nnvirtual in 0.72? Date: 09 Dec 1996 21:37:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.69) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149226 16798 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:27:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id SAA16545 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 18:56:13 -0800 Original-Received: from dunham.tcimet.net (qmailr@dunham.tcimet.net [198.109.161.223]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 03:40:09 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 8554 invoked by uid 501); 10 Dec 1996 02:37:23 -0000 Original-To: "\(ding\) Gnus Mailing List" , gnus-bug@ifi.uio.no (The Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys) In-Reply-To: Matt Pharr's message of 04 Dec 1996 17:22:58 -0800 Original-Lines: 68 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.74/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9158 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9158 Matt Pharr writes: > David Moore writes: > > Jason L Tibbitts III writes: > > > Unfortunately after I upgraded to 0.72 I found that after reading all of > > >the articles in the group and calling gnus-group-get-new-news the unread > > >article count would be some large number (like 1300, I assume the sum of > > >(max - min article) for each group). It seems that it's losing the list > > >of read articles, even though a long list shows up in the group info. > > .. > > > Has anyone seen this? I'm not submitting this as a bug report because I > > >could be screwing something up and since I don't really know where to > > >start > > > looking it would be a pretty pitiful bug report. > Another little piece of data about this: I raised the level of the groups > that make up one of my virtual groups to 3 and started newsreading. When I > started gnus, all was fine--there were a handful of new messages. After I > read news in one of the virtual groups with new news and caught up, exited > and returned to the Group buffer, all of the groups that made up the > virutal group has a jazillion unread messages in them. So maybe it's a > problem with how nnvirtual handles catching up... This problem is still there in 0.74... I have one nnvirtual group made up of two level 6 (unsubscribed) groups. Whenever I catch up in the nnvirtual group, it screws up the the read messages count in the constituent groups. i.e., U 6207: comp.os.linux.development.apps U 1353: comp.os.linux.development.system 4610: nnvirtual:comp.os.linux.development ("comp.os.linux.development.apps" 6 ((1 . 23143)) ((reply 28332 28811))) I change it to: ("comp.os.linux.development.apps" 6 ((1 . 28811)) ((reply 28332 28811))) (and save with C-c C-c) then do M-g on the virtual group and get: U 539: comp.os.linux.development.apps U 1353: comp.os.linux.development.system 1768: nnvirtual:comp.os.linux.development Then enter the virtual group and do a "c y" and we are back to U 6207: comp.os.linux.development.apps U 1353: comp.os.linux.development.system 4613: nnvirtual:comp.os.linux.development "G E" on the apps group gives: ("comp.os.linux.development.apps" 6 ((1 . 23143)) ((reply 28332 28811))) Funny thing is, "c y" in the *Groups* buffer seems to work right... Steve dunham@gdl.msu.edu