From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6084 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: September Gnus 0.75 is released Date: 30 Apr 1996 21:33:36 -0700 Sender: steve@miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.53) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146593 2502 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:43:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA03227 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 22:07:11 -0700 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@miranova.com [204.212.162.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Wed, 1 May 1996 06:33:25 +0200 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id VAA02817; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 21:33:37 -0700 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 22 Apr 1996 11:12:47 -0700 X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6084 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6084 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Steven L Baur writes: >> Well, what I really meant was the headers Gnus used to display, like >> To:, Cc:, Subject:, References:, In-Reply-To: (in that order) at the >> top. And Gcc:, Fcc: at the bottom, with custom headers and other Gnus >> supplied headers in between. Lars> Yup. `C-c C-h' in 0.78 will sort the headers. That's nice, I like it. I suppose if I look hard enough, there's a hook I can plug into to make this the default behavior. Lars> Hm. I just wrote the damn thing. `sort-subr' is nice. >> >> I don't know about ``hard way''. I like very much the kind of header >> highlighting done already when reading articles. All I'm really >> interested in doing is applying the same function to a message prior >> to editing. You've gone and done something a little different from what I was doing, but quite acceptable. The red for cited text makes a nice visual contrast. Bloody red is a strong encouragement to be concise in quoting as well :-). The coloring on the headers works for me. These changes make editing a message much easier for me. Thanks. -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour. Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone except you in November.