From: Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: What is a "virtual" group?
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:18:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m27gmtgqse.fsf@surfer-30-3-59.surfnet.iacbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2a9t1n7gn.fsf@cube.luannocracy.com> (Dave Abrahams's message of "Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:32:40 -0500")
on Tue Dec 25 2012, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>>>>> * Does the check for virtual-ness in gnus-warp-to-article actually
>>>>> belong there? After all, real groups shouldn't implement the
>>>>> warp-to-article backend function, should they?
>>>>
>>>> I don't know.
>>>
>>> Would you be open to a patch that removes the check?
>>
>> I'm not familiar with that code.
>
> Sorry, I don't know how to interpret your answer.
Bump on this. I get a sense the length of the message may have put you
off. I'll try to make this super-simple for you:
* I would like to remove the check for virtual-ness in
gnus-warp-to-article.
* I believe that removal to be OK. I'll test it here, of course, and
I'm a daily user of warping.
* If I don't find any problems with it, would that be enough to convince
you that the change is OK and to accept the patch?
* If not, what would it take to convince you to accept the patch?
All I really need from you is answers to the last two bullets above
The rest of what's below is background, designed to convince you it
might be worth taking a risk on such a change to get a really cool
feature, but you can ignore it if you're too busy.
> I am trying to figure out how to contribute a really cool (and for me,
> essential) piece of functionality to Gnus: the ability to, given a
> message-id, find and display the message in the context of the entire
> thread in which that message participates, even across groups. Of
> course I'm presuming you think that's worth having in Gnus, but I could
> be wrong. If so, just tell me and I'll stop pestering you.
>
> I have implemented something that works, but currently requires making
> nndoc groups virtual or disabling that check. You've already said that
> making nndoc groups virtual is inappropriate. If disabling the check is
> appropriate, that would solve the problem easily.
>
> The other possible approach would be to discover a way to implement the
> following function using some kind of virtual group (instead of nndoc).
> I think that's probably the best approach but I have tried myself many
> times and failed, and I have asked here many times for guidance without
> success... so I eventually gave up.
>
> #+begin_src lisp
> (defun gnus-goto-article (message-id)
> (with-temp-buffer
> (erase-buffer)
> ;; Insert dummy article
> (insert (format "From nobody Tue Sep 13 22:05:34 2011\n\n"))
> (gnus-group-read-ephemeral-group
> message-id
> `(nndoc ,message-id
> (nndoc-address ,(current-buffer))
> (nndoc-article-type mbox))
> :activate
> (cons (current-buffer) gnus-current-window-configuration)
> (not :request-only)
> '(-1) ; :select-articles
> (not :parameters)
> 0 ; :number
> )
> (gnus-summary-refer-article message-id)
> ))
> #+end_src
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing Software Development Training
http://www.boostpro.com Clang/LLVM/EDG Compilers C++ Boost
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-15 23:53 Dave Abrahams
2012-09-16 10:57 ` Steinar Bang
2012-09-16 15:08 ` Dave Abrahams
2012-09-16 15:15 ` Adam Sjøgren
2012-09-16 16:52 ` Steinar Bang
2012-12-25 12:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-12-25 20:23 ` Dave Abrahams
2012-12-25 20:31 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-12-25 20:51 ` Dave Abrahams
2012-12-25 20:59 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-12-25 21:32 ` Dave Abrahams
2012-12-25 21:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2013-01-31 18:10 ` Dave Abrahams
2013-01-31 18:18 ` Dave Abrahams [this message]
2013-01-31 23:18 ` Eric S Fraga
2013-02-20 5:06 ` Dave Abrahams
2013-04-22 8:38 ` Leonidas Tsampros
2013-04-25 13:50 ` Dave Abrahams
2013-04-25 17:48 ` Leonidas Tsampros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m27gmtgqse.fsf@surfer-30-3-59.surfnet.iacbox \
--to=dave@boostpro.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).