From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9880
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: rebuilding .overview
Date: 11 Feb 1997 13:43:39 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m27mkfqzr8.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <6iv3ev4r2g8.fsf@erpland.engin.umich.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149839 21115 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:37:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA29282
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 05:17:24 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex27.uio.no [129.240.154.47]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <NAA19653@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 13:56:58 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id NAA21667; Tue, 11 Feb 1997 13:43:40 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Michael Lamoureux's message of 10 Feb 1997 12:33:11 -0500
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.13/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9880
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9880

Michael Lamoureux <lamour@engin.umich.edu> writes:

> Also, after running the above function all of the new messages (there
> were 105 new messages, which is how I noticed there was a problem in
> the first place), all of the messages that were added back into the
> .overview file were given a mark of read instead of unread.  I had to
> enter the group with C-u Ret to see them.  Is that the best default
> mark to have for such an operation?

I can't explain this.  Regenerating the .overview files doesn't affect
article readedness at all -- all that's being handled by Gnus, and
Gnus knows nothing about .overview files and stuff like that.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen